EUROPE ARMING UP!

 The Euro-War, the Globalist Plot, and the Path Forward Through the Right

Image-AFPP-IA

By Antonio Fernando Pinheiro Pedro

Europe is on the move—not toward peace, but toward militarization. The “ReArm Europe” plan, presented as a response to contemporary threats, reveals a globalist strategy that ignores the lessons of history and embraces confrontation as a tool for geopolitical repositioning.

This article critically analyzes the risks of that strategy, drawing parallels with the fall of Rome, the instrumentalization of NATO, and the violent reaction of the globalist left to the worldwide rise of conservative movements.

More than an analysis, this is a warning: the solution to the crisis will not come from Brussels’ bureaucracy, but from the restoration of sovereignty—and that restoration will be led by the right.

The Euro-War

Europe is arming itself. And not for protection—but for repositioning.

The “ReArm Europe” plan, launched by the European Commission, aims to transform the continent into a military power by 2030.

Air shields, military coalitions, pan-European mobility—all under the pretext of “preserving peace.” But the reality is different: it’s a desperate attempt by a crumbling globalist elite to maintain control over a continent that no longer leads anything.

The Great Reset

The “Great Reset,” an initiative of the World Economic Forum under Klaus Schwab, was marketed as a benign restructuring of the global economic and social system after the COVID-19 pandemic—promoting “positive changes in economic, social, and environmental spheres,” shifting capitalism’s focus from profit to “more equitable and sustainable outcomes.”

However, what seemed like Alice’s Wonderland quickly turned into the Queen of Hearts’ domain. Enlightened voters in democratic regimes—awakened from the pandemic nightmare—recognized in the rhetoric and actions a clear attempt to build a “world government” that would control every aspect of social and economic life through a “progressive” elite entrenched in multilateral bureaucracies funded by highly concentrated globalist capital.

This “reset” contaminated institutions, academia, media, and public and corporate social responsibility programs—generating conflict, persecution, and censorship.

The reaction was swift: a conservative wave, already underway before the pandemic, gained momentum across Europe and the Americas, cornering the so-called “progressive globalism,” which now seems intent on pressing the reset button through war—and the “ReArm Europe” plan makes that intention clear.

It’s crucial to recognize the signs, the symptoms of this process—and the possible cure.

NATO: From Defensive Shield to Provocation Tool

NATO, once a symbol of Western security, is now a disjointed alliance—lacking unified command and clear purpose.

Reviving it as the armed wing of the European Union is a strategic mistake. It drags the strategic framework back to the Cold War era and generates conflict instead of resolving it.

Europe doesn’t need NATO on standby—it needs a new strategic articulation that respects national sovereignty. It needs leaders who represent popular sovereignty, not the interests of Davos, Bildeberg, or Brussels bureaucrats.

The Globalist Reaction to the Conservative Surge

The rise of sovereignist right-wing movements worldwide has triggered a violent reaction from the globalist left.

Assassination attempts against conservative leaders, judicial persecution, censorship, and institutional weaponization have become common in transitional regimes—where the globalist establishment and its leftist apparatus find themselves exposed, denounced on social media, and overwhelmed by public discontent.

In this destructive reaction, democracy is being corroded from within—by the deep state, under the guise of “defending democratic order.” The “War against Eurasia” becomes the Orwellian escape hatch to justify maintaining the status quo.

Russia and China: Civilizational Projects, Not Threats

The demonization of Russia and China is part of the globalist “1984” narrative. It serves only to justify Europe’s rearmament.

Yet these nations operate under their own civilizational logic.

Russia, since Alexander III, has preserved the idea of a Slavic civilizational empire stretching from Eastern Europe to Vladivostok.

From Peter and Catherine to Medvedev and Putin, European culture crystallized in the Russian Empire and expanded eastward. The socialist period was merely an 80-year hiccup in eight centuries of transition—from Mongol retreat to Viking and Roman advance. Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick, architect of Reagan’s diplomatic doctrine, viewed this “Soviet hiccup” as a totalitarian anomaly—an Iron Curtain that could be dismantled as a remnant of the old czarist sphere of influence. That dismantling is now underway.

Putin may lead a monocratic regime today, but it’s far from the totalitarianism of the Soviet era.

China, meanwhile, has always maintained a monolithic governance system. But the Maoist totalitarian period is long gone. Since Deng Xiaoping, massive changes have reshaped China’s economy and society. There’s been a revival of materialist doctrine rooted in Confucianism, Taoism, and yin-yang philosophy. The Chinese Communist Party has officially abandoned Marxist orthodoxy, recognizing that any doctrine must adapt to “Chinese cultural reality.” Today’s regime is a vast entrepreneurial philosophy aimed at material comfort and prosperity—run like a massive holding company, with leadership emerging through strict meritocracy.

It’s not Western-style democracy, but it is a planned experiment in ideological detachment, focused on economic development in a market-driven world. The “Belt and Road” initiative seeks commercial and diplomatic expansion—not military confrontation.

The Real Focus: Markets and Industry

The geographic friction point with the West is the South China Sea—centered on Taiwan. Even that can be resolved pragmatically.

Taiwan is also thriving, competing with mainland China in high-tech sectors—especially in the niche market of microprocessors and semiconductors.

The real dispute between the U.S. and China today is over industrial parks—transferred to Asia by globalists over the past forty years, leaving the West mired in hypocritical humanitarian, welfare, and ecological indulgences that led to unemployment, exclusion, and economic decay.

The market, backed by firm geostrategic action—especially in Western nations reclaimed by conservative sovereignist leadership—is working to rebalance trade by investing in free enterprise and reviving industry.

Naturally, the globalist left is lost in this new landscape. The massive economic concentration held by financial groups that once funded it—under the indulgence model—is now dissolving in favor of local prosperity projects, reducing support for ineffective welfare and eco-humanitarian programs.

The assertive tariff policy—combined with the defense of free markets and free speech, implemented by the new Trump administration—will lead to a market realignment between Trump, Xi, and Putin—without progressive Europe. That arrangement is already on the horizon and is the most realistic path to global stability.

Faced with this scenario, Brussels’ bureaucracy and its globalist sponsors are panicking—and trying to counter the process by escalating conflict.

Rome Revisited: Immigration Without Integration Breeds Conflict

Globalist Europe, over nearly forty years of post–Iron Curtain transformation, opened its borders indiscriminately—repeating the fatal mistake of the Roman Empire.

In his work on Rome’s military decline, Arther Ferrill shows how the assimilation of migratory hordes—including the replacement of legionary ranks with barbarian elements lacking loyalty to the state—eroded Rome’s military discipline, mirroring internal divisions and economic crises that undermined its governance.

Today, mass immigration, encouraged by globalist elites, similarly fragments national identity in Western countries. The collective personality disorder triggered by the “politically correct” virus has led Europe and Democrat-led America to suffer from a “Chamberlain Syndrome”—especially in their deliberate blindness to radical Muslim barbarism, embraced by the left as a new form of “resistance against white Christian capitalism.”

Today, unassimilated migrants form cultural enclaves across globalist Europe, ignore local laws, resist cultural adaptation, and live off social programs—without any commitment to their host nations. Of course, this doesn’t apply to all—just as it didn’t in Rome...

The War Against Moral Values

Progressivism injects “Marcusean” patterns from the Frankfurt School, replacing the class struggle between proletariat and bourgeoisie with a divisive battle between marginalized minorities—the lumpenproletariat and the modern middle class, which is the cultural backbone of democracy. The attack on property has become a war against every human, Jewish, and Christian value of Western civilization.

Progressive proselytism works to sever merit and prosperity from governance. Welfare systems perpetuate exclusion and fuel resentment—creating the ideal fragmentation scenario that undermines national sovereignty and destroys popular sovereignty. Financial flows shift to transnational globalist groups, reinforcing the concept of “global government” and “local misery.”

This is the root of the progressive obsession with diffuse conflicts, impossible demands, and chronically unsolvable battles.

In this landscape of manipulated justice, value inversion, repression of criticism, and censorship of free speech, “defending democracy” now morphs into “defending Europe militarily”—for the benefit of the same globalists (now visibly cornered).

The Way Out Is Through the Right: Sovereignty, Identity, and Leadership

Europe’s crisis won’t be solved with more bureaucracy, more weapons, or more censorship.

The solution lies with the right. In restoring national sovereignty, valuing local culture, defending borders, and rejecting supranational control.

Europe needs leaders who govern for their people—not for the foundations and forums that gather in five-star hotels to decide the fate of billions of impoverished souls.

History is at stake—and this time, there will be no excuse for silence.

The new European war is the desperate embrace of a drowning

References:

PEDRO, Antonio Fernando Pinheiro:

"A Segurança Regional Americana, A Escalada Militar de Maduro e o Risco Continental", in Blog "The Eagle View", in  https://www.theeagleview.com.br/2025/08/a-seguranca-regional-americana-escalada.html

"A Fábrica de Desinformação da Europa", in Blog "The Eagle View", in https://www.theeagleview.com.br/2025/07/a-fabrica-de-desinfomacao-da-europa.html

"Globalização e o Risco da Nova Ordem Mundial", in Blog "The Eagle View", in https://www.theeagleview.com.br/2019/09/globalizacao-e-o-risco-da-nova-ordem.html

"O Contexto Geopolítico da China", in Blog "The Eagle View", in  https://www.theeagleview.com.br/2020/03/o-contexto-da-china-para-alem-da.html

"O mundo dos Idiotas Transviados", in Blog "The Eagle View", in https://www.theeagleview.com.br/2017/10/o-mundo-dos-idiotas-transviados.html

"Esquerdismo é Coisa de Louco", in Blog "The Eagle View", in https://www.theeagleview.com.br/2015/11/esquerdismo-virou-coisa-de-louco.html

"GLOBALISTAS ACUADOS: BIDEN E MACRON ESTIMULAM O CONFLITO E PODEM PROVOCAR UMA GUERRA", vídeo in  https://youtu.be/PkgJdI99ne0?si=dXfNQohIXiSN9xoU

MILIBAND, David:   "O mundo além da Ucrânia  - A sobrevivência do Ocidente e as exigências do resto", in Blog "The Eagle View", in  https://www.theeagleview.com.br/2023/04/o-mundo-alem-da-ucrania.html

FERRIL, Arther: "A queda do Império Romano: a explicação militar (no original em inglês The Fall of the Roman Empire: The Military Explanation)",  Editora Zahar, SP, 1989

KIRKPATRICK, Jeane: "Dictatorships and Double Standards", Commentary Magazine,  Nov. 1979

Commission and High Representative - Defence Roadmap to strengthen European defence capabilities 2030", oct 2025,  in https://defence-industry-space.ec.europa.eu/commission-and-high-representative-present-new-defence-roadmap-strengthen-european-defence-2025-10-16_en

Antonio Fernando Pinheiro Pedro is a lawyer (University of São Paulo), journalist, and institutional and environmental consultant. He is the founding partner of Pinheiro Pedro Advogados law firm and director of AICA – Corporate and Environmental Intelligence Agency . He served on the Green Economy Task Force of the International Chamber of Commerce, was a professor at the Barro Branco Military Police Academy, and a lecturer at NISAM — the Information and Environmental Health Center at the University of São Paulo. He has worked as a consultant for UNICRI — the United Nations Interregional Crime Research Institute, as well as for UNDP, the World Bank, and the IFC. He is a member of the Brazilian Institute of Lawyers (IAB), the Superior Council for National Studies and Policy at FIESP — the Federation of Industries of the State of São Paulo, and Vice President of the São Paulo Press Association. He is Editor-in-Chief of the Ambiente Legal portal and curator of the blog The Eagle View.